2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of wolf (Canis lupus) kill-sites using hidden Markov models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, behaviour may be inferred by characterizing patterns of movement based solely on the geometry or complexity of an animal's path using techniques such as tortuosity [8,9], positional entropy [10,11] or first-passage time [12]. In addition, modelling approaches such as Gaussian mixtures have been used to classify animal tracking data into discrete modes of movement [2,13], while state-space models including hidden Markov models (HMMs) [10,[14][15][16][17][18][19] have been used to identify different modes of movement and the dynamics of switching between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, behaviour may be inferred by characterizing patterns of movement based solely on the geometry or complexity of an animal's path using techniques such as tortuosity [8,9], positional entropy [10,11] or first-passage time [12]. In addition, modelling approaches such as Gaussian mixtures have been used to classify animal tracking data into discrete modes of movement [2,13], while state-space models including hidden Markov models (HMMs) [10,[14][15][16][17][18][19] have been used to identify different modes of movement and the dynamics of switching between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global Positioning System (GPS) technology enables collection of high resolution spatio-temporal movement data that then can be used to locate kill sites, identify prey species, and thereby determine species-specific kill rates (Anderson and Lindzey 2003, Sand et al 2005, Franke et al 2006. However, this application of GPS technology is still not well developed and we know of published examples on only 2 species: pumas (Puma concolor: Anderson and Lindzey 2003) and wolves (Canis lupus: Sand et al 2005, Franke et al 2006, Webb et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this application of GPS technology is still not well developed and we know of published examples on only 2 species: pumas (Puma concolor: Anderson and Lindzey 2003) and wolves (Canis lupus: Sand et al 2005, Franke et al 2006, Webb et al 2008). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cluster analysis is a means of calculating kill rates of prey (Anderson and Lindzey 2003, Sand et al 2005, Franke et al 2006, Zimmerman et al 2007, Webb et al 2008, Merrill et al 2010. Although cluster analysis alone provides inaccurate estimates of kill rates, it can guide field investigations (Webb et al 2008, Merrill et al 2010.…”
Section: Wolves) Forays Were Identified Using Arcmap (Environmental mentioning
confidence: 99%