2021 IEEE 13th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environ 2021
DOI: 10.1109/hnicem54116.2021.9731979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Weld Current Using Deep Transfer Image Networks Based on Weld Signatures for Quality Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the selected ERNN models have the minimum MSE and better accuracy closer to the actual value of current and voltage signals which is essential compared to manual computations of output parameters through Ohm's Law and it is proven that RNN works effectively as presented in [16], [18] by its ability to estimate reference voltage for monitoring purposes without actually performing any measurements and in predicting electrical parameters. Compared with LSTM and GRU, the ERNN model has the ultimate advantages of fast training speed and lower predictive error in this application.…”
Section: Simulation Comparison Of Voltage Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that the selected ERNN models have the minimum MSE and better accuracy closer to the actual value of current and voltage signals which is essential compared to manual computations of output parameters through Ohm's Law and it is proven that RNN works effectively as presented in [16], [18] by its ability to estimate reference voltage for monitoring purposes without actually performing any measurements and in predicting electrical parameters. Compared with LSTM and GRU, the ERNN model has the ultimate advantages of fast training speed and lower predictive error in this application.…”
Section: Simulation Comparison Of Voltage Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the study of [17], researchers compared neural network prediction models, support vector machine (SVM) for regression, and equation discovery for predicting the next voltage values without performing measurements. Another prediction modeling was employed through a convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect and categorize welding current to construct an ERT imaging trailer and detect defects [18]. While in [19], the paper suggests a prediction model of the input voltage signal received by an underground imaging system based on genetic programming (GP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%