2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of water main failures with the spatial clustering of breaks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the implementation of artificial intelligence in water asset management planning has gained much attention in the last decade. Specifically, machine learning algorithms have been widely utilized to develop failure prediction models by using system‐specific data, such as pipe attributes, hydraulic condition, maintenance and failure history, combined with other supplemental data, such as climate information, environmental data and other (T. Y. J. Chen et al, 2021; T. Chen & Guikema, 2020; Konstantinou & Stoianov, 2020; Yazdekhasti et al, 2020). This approach is data‐intensive; however, the results are an unbiased evaluation of system‐specific data which provides more reliable results compared to a qualitative model.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Of Water Mainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As such, the implementation of artificial intelligence in water asset management planning has gained much attention in the last decade. Specifically, machine learning algorithms have been widely utilized to develop failure prediction models by using system‐specific data, such as pipe attributes, hydraulic condition, maintenance and failure history, combined with other supplemental data, such as climate information, environmental data and other (T. Y. J. Chen et al, 2021; T. Chen & Guikema, 2020; Konstantinou & Stoianov, 2020; Yazdekhasti et al, 2020). This approach is data‐intensive; however, the results are an unbiased evaluation of system‐specific data which provides more reliable results compared to a qualitative model.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Of Water Mainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, machine learning algorithms have been widely utilized to develop failure prediction models by using system-specific data, such as pipe attributes, hydraulic condition, maintenance and failure history, combined with other supplemental data, such as climate information, environmental data and other (T. Y. J. Chen et al, 2021;T. Chen & Guikema, 2020;Konstantinou & Stoianov, 2020;Yazdekhasti et al, 2020).…”
Section: Article Impact Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The complicated and heterogeneous structure of the WDNs makes evaluating the effect of a pipe-burst a challenging task. In contrast, the previously developed central sections of the networks became older and more exposed to the randomly appearing pipe bursts, according to the work of [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scheidegger et al [1] mention in their conclusions that faults on water pipes may have a spacial dependability and should be incorporated into failure prediction models. Further, Chen and Guikema [17] found that that use of spatial clusters, as an explanatory variable, can improve the accuracy of pipe break machine learning models. To take spacial dependability into account in fault prediction, a suitable segmentation of long transmission mains is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%