Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods 2017
DOI: 10.5220/0006209602330238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of User Opinion for Products - A Bag-of-Words and Collaborative Filtering based Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dictionary can be of constant length-common to all products-containing the most commonly used opinion-words in the whole review dataset [42], or as proposed of variable length solving the problems of: (i) using a large set of words that are not shared by different products and thereof introducing unnecessary sparsity in the input matrix, (ii) this same increase on sparsity worsens to some extent the prediction capabilities of the algorithm, and (iii) the only use of opinion-words as vocabulary allows the overall opinion prediction for a product but not for the sentiment associated with its characteristics. Since different products have truly different features, we must consider a distinctive set of opinion-words for each one of them, reducing the number of features and the sparsity of the input matrix.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dictionary can be of constant length-common to all products-containing the most commonly used opinion-words in the whole review dataset [42], or as proposed of variable length solving the problems of: (i) using a large set of words that are not shared by different products and thereof introducing unnecessary sparsity in the input matrix, (ii) this same increase on sparsity worsens to some extent the prediction capabilities of the algorithm, and (iii) the only use of opinion-words as vocabulary allows the overall opinion prediction for a product but not for the sentiment associated with its characteristics. Since different products have truly different features, we must consider a distinctive set of opinion-words for each one of them, reducing the number of features and the sparsity of the input matrix.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%