2023
DOI: 10.3390/rs15010284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Urban Forest Aboveground Carbon Using Machine Learning Based on Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2: A Case Study of Shanghai, China

Abstract: The aboveground carbon storage (AGC) of urban forests is an important indicator reflecting the ecological function of urban forests. It is essential to monitor the AGC of urban forests and analyze their spatiotemporal distributions. Remote sensing is a technical tool that can be leveraged to accurately monitor forest AGC, whereas machine learning is an important algorithm for the accurate prediction of AGC. Therefore, in this study, single Landsat 8 (L) remote sensing data, single Sentinel-2 (S) remote sensing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with the results obtained by Ou et al, who used Landsat 8 and a spatial regression model for predicting AGB [38]. For AGC estimation methods, there are also nonparametric and machine-learning models, which are higher than GWR in terms of fitting accuracy [30,83]. Li et al employed Sentinel-2 and used four machine learning methods to estimate forest AGC in Shanghai.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysis Of Agc Estimationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This finding is consistent with the results obtained by Ou et al, who used Landsat 8 and a spatial regression model for predicting AGB [38]. For AGC estimation methods, there are also nonparametric and machine-learning models, which are higher than GWR in terms of fitting accuracy [30,83]. Li et al employed Sentinel-2 and used four machine learning methods to estimate forest AGC in Shanghai.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysis Of Agc Estimationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…By comparing and analyzing the three MBF canopy parameter estimation methods for the PROSAIL_MLRA model, PROSAIL_XGBR outperformed PRO-SAIL_ETR, which, in turn, was superior to PROSAIL_MLPR (Table 4). The tree-based integration algorithms (e.g., ETR, XGBR) performed better than the MLPR in terms of performance [68,69]. The better performance of tree-based integration algorithms stemmed from their flexibility and strength in handling all data types.…”
Section: Mixed Inversion Modeling Of Canopy Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superiority of XGBoost and LightGBM in SM downscaling has been confirmed [14,21]. CatBoost is widely used in various ML tasks due to its advantages in dealing with categorical features and regression issues [22,23]. But its applications in SM downscaling are relatively limited, and it is necessary to evaluate its applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%