2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-022-02964-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength Using Fully Bayesian Gaussian Process Regression (fB-GPR) with Model Class Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common method for measuring rock mass strength is the indoor test on the uniaxial compressive strength UCS 17 . The UCS is one of the key parameters of rock mechanics 18 and one of the most important geomechanical parameters for preliminary and final designs of civil engineering, geotechnical engineering, mining engineering, and underground engineering, i.e., dams, rock excavation, tunnels, slope stability, and infrastructure 19 , 20 , and is used for the evaluation of rock hardness 21 and grade classification. Since inaccurate UCS results would cause project budget overruns or even the collapse of related structures 22 , precise UCS calculation of the rock mass is of great significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common method for measuring rock mass strength is the indoor test on the uniaxial compressive strength UCS 17 . The UCS is one of the key parameters of rock mechanics 18 and one of the most important geomechanical parameters for preliminary and final designs of civil engineering, geotechnical engineering, mining engineering, and underground engineering, i.e., dams, rock excavation, tunnels, slope stability, and infrastructure 19 , 20 , and is used for the evaluation of rock hardness 21 and grade classification. Since inaccurate UCS results would cause project budget overruns or even the collapse of related structures 22 , precise UCS calculation of the rock mass is of great significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers have developed many empirical equations for predicting the UCS of rocks. Soft computing-based UCS prediction primarily, i.e., Bayesian analysis 20 , ANN 31 , 32 , fuzzy system 33 , 34 , regression trees 35 , 36 , genetic algorithm 23 , 37 , imperialist competitive algorithm 38 , and particle swarm optimization technique 39 . So, Soft computing techniques predict UCS more accurately than traditional statistical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common method for measuring rock mass strength is the indoor test on the uniaxial compressive strength UCS (Jeffery et al, 2021). The UCS is one of the key parameters of rock mechanics (Matin et al, 2018) and one of the most important geomechanical parameters for preliminary and final designs of civil engineering, geotechnical engineering, mining engineering, and underground engineering, i.e., dams, rock excavation, tunnels, slope stability, and infrastructure (Murlidhar et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2022), and is used for the evaluation of rock hardness (Kong et al, 2021) and grade classification. Since inaccurate UCS results would cause project budget overruns or even the collapse of related structures (Ng et al, 2015), precise UCS calculation of the rock mass is of great significance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers have developed many empirical equations for predicting the UCS of rocks. Soft computing-based UCS prediction primarily, i.e., Bayesian analysis (Zhao et al, 2022), ANN (Kahraman et al, 2006;Le et al, 2022), fuzzy system (Mishra and Basu, 2013;Parsajoo et al, 2022), regression trees (Ghasemi et al, 2018;Liang et al, 2016), genetic algorithm (Alemdag et al, 2016;Baykasoglu et al, 2008), imperialist competitive algorithm (Jahed , and particle swarm optimization technique (Momeni et al, 2015). So, Soft computing techniques predict UCS more accurately than traditional statistical methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%