2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of tunnel boring machine operating parameters using various machine learning algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model, combining variational mode decomposition (VMD), empirical wavelet transform (EWT) and long shortterm memory (LSTM) network, can accurately predict cutterhead torque of shield tunneling machine in multiple time steps. Xu et al [26] successfully predicted the shield thrust using five different statistical and ensemble machine learning methods.…”
Section: B Intelligent Prediction For Shield Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model, combining variational mode decomposition (VMD), empirical wavelet transform (EWT) and long shortterm memory (LSTM) network, can accurately predict cutterhead torque of shield tunneling machine in multiple time steps. Xu et al [26] successfully predicted the shield thrust using five different statistical and ensemble machine learning methods.…”
Section: B Intelligent Prediction For Shield Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After determining the basic parameters of the AI algorithms, it was also necessary to determine other hyperparameters, such as the number of trees in RF algorithm, the hidden layer nodes in BPNN, CNN, LSTM, and GRU algorithms, etc. For these hyperparameters, we used grid search to determine specific values [13,61]. First, on the training set, we provided a series of priori candidate values of various model parameters, then all parameter combinations were searched through the grid.…”
Section: Parameters Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, although there is no specific way to say which the two algorithms would show better performance, it can be said that bagging is more useful for a dataset that is prone to high variance and the target is to decrease the model prediction variance (Grandvalet, 2004). In contrast, the gradientboosting approaches have shown acceptable outcomes in problems interacting with a dataset having features with complex and non-linear relationships, especially in regression ones (Xu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%