SAE Technical Paper Series 1979
DOI: 10.4271/790416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Track Tension when Traversing an Obstacle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The track model employed in [17] assumes quasi-static track response, and uniform tension throughout the entire track loop. In addition, shear forces beneath the roadwheels were modeled assuming they were uniformly distributed and track bridging was approximated using kinematic relations similar to those employed in [8,9]. These simpli®cations limit the ®delity of this model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The track model employed in [17] assumes quasi-static track response, and uniform tension throughout the entire track loop. In addition, shear forces beneath the roadwheels were modeled assuming they were uniformly distributed and track bridging was approximated using kinematic relations similar to those employed in [8,9]. These simpli®cations limit the ®delity of this model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent developments [8±16] also employed the rigid terrain assumption. Doyle and Workman [8] and Garnich and Grimm [9] both considered uneven (rigid) terrain and simple kinematic models for track bridging. Sankar et al [12] considered the random roughness of the terrain, and Rubinstein and Galili [14] took into account soil dissipation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation