2012
DOI: 10.3390/mca17030182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Tire Tractive Performance by Using Artificial Neural Networks

Abstract: Abstract-The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between travel reduction and tractive performance and to illustrate how artificial neural networks (ANNs) could play an important role in the prediction of these parameters. The experimental values were taken in a soil bin. A 1-4-6-2 artificial neural network (ANN) model with a back propagation learning algorithm was developed to predict the tractive performance of a driven tire in a clay loam soil under varying operating and soil condition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative error of the predicted value was found to be less (10%) than the acceptable limits (Taner, 2007;Çarman, Taner, 2012). In the regression model, the R 2 value was found to be 92.64% and the RMSE value was found to be 0.0962.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative error of the predicted value was found to be less (10%) than the acceptable limits (Taner, 2007;Çarman, Taner, 2012). In the regression model, the R 2 value was found to be 92.64% and the RMSE value was found to be 0.0962.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Measurements and modelling of wind erosion rate in different tillage practices using a portable wind erosion tunnel calculated using the following equations (Kashaninejad et al, 2009;Çarman, Taner, 2012):…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values calculated from ANN model according to the experimental values, average error of WMOB, SOB and ED was found as 0.32, 0.30 and 0.34 %, respectively. The average error was acceptable for all parameters that were obtained under the limit (10 %) [39].…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network (Ann) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The mean relative error of measured and predicted values were 4.029 % for chickpea and 5.611 % for dry bean. For chickpea and dry bean seeds, the relative error of predicted value was found to be less than the acceptable limits (10%) (Çarman and Taner, 2012). Roy et al, (2019) Projected area (cm 2 ) Soylu et.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 92%