2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.09.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of thrombus formation using vortical structures presentation in Stanford type B aortic dissection: A preliminary study using CFD approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous CFD studies on aortic dissection [14], a distinct flow jet can be seen at the entry tear and 1 st re-entry tear, as also shown in figure 3. A few recirculation zones (white arrows) are observed around the tears in the false lumen of descending aorta, which is in agreement with published aortic dissection simulations [1]. In the true lumen, a small recirculation region (yellow arrow) is observed after the luminal narrowing in the aortic arch at the site of the distal anastomosis of the aortic graft.…”
Section: Numerical Simulations and Postprocessingsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with previous CFD studies on aortic dissection [14], a distinct flow jet can be seen at the entry tear and 1 st re-entry tear, as also shown in figure 3. A few recirculation zones (white arrows) are observed around the tears in the false lumen of descending aorta, which is in agreement with published aortic dissection simulations [1]. In the true lumen, a small recirculation region (yellow arrow) is observed after the luminal narrowing in the aortic arch at the site of the distal anastomosis of the aortic graft.…”
Section: Numerical Simulations and Postprocessingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In recent years, an increasing number of studies with patient-specific anatomy based on clinical imaging has been performed, providing higher geometric accuracy. However, simple boundary conditions or boundary conditions from healthy aorta have mostly been used in these studies due to limited patient-specific haemodynamic data [1,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 37 were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria. Of 17 eligible studies, 3 studies were further excluded due to repetitive reports by the same research group, and only the most recent studies from each group were used, leading to 14 studies included in the analysis [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Table 1 shows characteristics of these eligible studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the hemodynamic analyses in this study were established based on the assumption of Newtonian flow. Due to the high shear rates and low particle effect in aortic flow, the Newtonian model is widely applied in CFD studies that aim to reveal the flow patterns of aortic dissection 32 - 34 , while studies focusing on thrombosis formation employ non-Newtonian model 35 , 36 . Previous studies comparing these two models confirmed the general similarity of the basic flow characteristics between them, while a slightly lower peak WSS was found near the vessel wall in the non-Newtonian flow model 37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%