2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-022-02456-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the minimum effective size of a population viable in the long term

Abstract: The establishment of the minimum size for a viable population (MVP) has been used as a guidance in conservation practice to determine the extinction risks of populations and species. A consensus MVP rule of 50/500 individuals has been attained, according to which a minimum effective population size of Ne = 50 is needed to avoid extinction due to inbreeding depression in the short term, and of Ne = 500 to survive in the long term. However, the large inbreeding loads (B) usually found in nature, as well as the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this relationship (435.4 copies per 380 ± 45 individuals), an approximate estimate can be made of the population abundance (Figure 3). This suggests that only seven river systems in Hokkaido meet the general requirement for the minimum effective population sizes for a population to persist in the long term; namely, the effective population size of 500 or 1,000 according to Franklin (1980) or Pérez‐Pereira et al (2022) respectively. Given that the effective population size is usually smaller than the census population size in the wild (Araki, Waples & Blouin, 2007), at least 10 out of the 17 river systems (58.8%) host Sakhalin taimen populations potentially at risk of extinction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this relationship (435.4 copies per 380 ± 45 individuals), an approximate estimate can be made of the population abundance (Figure 3). This suggests that only seven river systems in Hokkaido meet the general requirement for the minimum effective population sizes for a population to persist in the long term; namely, the effective population size of 500 or 1,000 according to Franklin (1980) or Pérez‐Pereira et al (2022) respectively. Given that the effective population size is usually smaller than the census population size in the wild (Araki, Waples & Blouin, 2007), at least 10 out of the 17 river systems (58.8%) host Sakhalin taimen populations potentially at risk of extinction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For C. formosanus, however, way more events were recorded from the Stairway Plot analyses. That said, it is surprising that this species, which is regarded as the most common in Taiwan, is showing signs of decline-although the current Ne should still be way larger than enough to sustain the population (Franklin, 1980;Pérez Pereira et al, 2022). The recent demographic decrease might be the result of extirpation events (Legendre et al, 2008) possibly caused by changes in land use in Taiwan (De Vivo and Huang, 2022), given that hairworms are sensitive to human activities and pollution (Poinar, 2008;Sato et al, 2014;Chiu et al, 2016;Achiorno et al, 2018).…”
Section: Demographic History Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools can be important for inferring a population’s cryptic genetic diversity and changes in effective population size ( Ne ) over time (Criscione, 2013, 2016; Strobel et al , 2019). Ne is known to greatly influence the genetic diversity and viability of populations (Criscione et al , 2005; Franklin, 1980; Pérez□Pereira et al , 2022), but estimating it in parasites may come with some caveats depending on the studied system (Criscione and Blouin, 2005; Strobel et al , 2019). That being said, estimates of Ne can be helpful for considering the taxa’s conservation status (Franklin, 1980; Pérez□Pereira et al , 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 50/500 rule recommends a minimum N̂ e of 50 to avoid inbreeding in the short-term, and a minimum N̂ e of 500 to allow sufficient genetic diversity for adaptation in the long-term (Franklin, 1980; Jamieson & Allendorf, 2012). Although the 50/500 criteria is increasingly incorporated into minimum viable population size assessments (e.g., IUCN Red List, Convention on Biological Diversity; Hoban, 2020; Laikre et al, 2020; Mace et al, 2008), the broad applicability of this criteria in conservation is heavily debated (Frankham et al, 2013; Franklin et al, 2014; Jamieson & Allendorf, 2012; Laikre et al, 2021), and some authors recommend increasing the minimum thresholds to 100 and 1000 to maintain populations’ fitness and adaptive potential (Frankham, 2014; García-Dorado, 2015; Jamieson & Allendorf, 2012; Pérez-Pereira et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%