2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the mass loss rate of polymer materials: Impact of residue formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the majority of CFD simulations of CC tests for both charring [31,32] and noncharring materials [33][34][35], participation of the gas phase in radiative heat transfer is neglected [31][32][33]. In order to eliminate errors associated with the use of this simplifying assumption, a detailed simulation approach is followed by taking into account gas phase radiation phenomena between the cone heater and the material surface.…”
Section: Validation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the majority of CFD simulations of CC tests for both charring [31,32] and noncharring materials [33][34][35], participation of the gas phase in radiative heat transfer is neglected [31][32][33]. In order to eliminate errors associated with the use of this simplifying assumption, a detailed simulation approach is followed by taking into account gas phase radiation phenomena between the cone heater and the material surface.…”
Section: Validation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of this model was verified by comparing conductive and radiative transfer, mass transport, and chemical reaction simulations to the corresponding analytical solutions [4]. This model was also shown to be able to capture experimentally observed burning behavior of a wide range of materials [6,7,20].…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the flame heat flux is simply estimated by fitting the cone calorimeter heat release rate for a single external irradiance level. Quantitative predictions are improved when using heating curves specific of each irradiation level . On the other hand, the flame heat fluxes seem to depend not only on the specific material properties but also on the estimation method (for instance, 10 kW/m 2 [Patel et al], 11‐15 kW/m 2 [Stoliarov et al and Patel et al], or 16‐47 kW/m 2 [Spearpoint and Quintiere]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%