2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-011-4280-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the lowest energy configuration for Lennard-Jones clusters

Abstract: Based on the work of previous researchers, a new unbiased optimization algorithm-the dynamic lattice searching method with two-phase local search and interior operation (DLS-TPIO) -is proposed in this paper. This algorithm is applied to the optimization of Lennard-Jones (LJ) clusters with N = 2-650, 660, and 665-680. For each case, the putative global minimum reported in the Cambridge Cluster Database (CCD) is successfully found. Furthermore, for LJ 533 and LJ 536 , the potential energies obtained in this stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[27][28][29] The LJ pair potential can be defined as follows: The main interaction potential we adopt is the LJ pair potential, which for several decades has been used as a benchmark for cluster energy minimization methods, and which even today constitutes a challenging and active area of research.…”
Section: The Fire Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[27][28][29] The LJ pair potential can be defined as follows: The main interaction potential we adopt is the LJ pair potential, which for several decades has been used as a benchmark for cluster energy minimization methods, and which even today constitutes a challenging and active area of research.…”
Section: The Fire Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main interaction potential we adopt is the LJ pair potential, which for several decades has been used as a benchmark for cluster energy minimization methods, and which even today constitutes a challenging and active area of research. [27][28][29] The LJ pair potential can be defined as follows:…”
Section: The Fire Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No symmetry constraints are imposed during the minimisations. This approach is therefore related to lattice-based approaches, 8,9,[17][18][19][20][21]43,44 but with sites defined by incomplete orbits of G core , which change throughout a run depending upon the current configuration.…”
Section: Overview Of the Core Orbits Symmetrisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best previous published results for optimisation of Lennard-Jones clusters involve particle swarm optimisation with symmetrical structures used to initialise the search. 13 Lattice-based searches have also proved to be effective, 8,9,[19][20][21]43,44 so long as a lattice that supports the true global minimum structure is included in the analysis. The core orbits approach described in the present contribution does not assume any particular point group symmetry, but instead searches for approximate symmetry operations in a general way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…− Lai et al (2011a) found best solutions for N = 533 and 536 using the dynamic lattice searching method with two-phase local search and interior operation [31,32,55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%