2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2741006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction Of The Fracture Due To Mannesmann Effect In Tube Piercing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this ratio allows predicting the fracture location and identifying the main process parameters such as the number of rolls, the feed angle value, and some other parameters that affect the fracture, its value and location. The most known name for this ratio is "stress triaxiality" or "triaxiality" [8,12,[14][15][16]18]. The calculation of this value is realized in the QForm software:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this ratio allows predicting the fracture location and identifying the main process parameters such as the number of rolls, the feed angle value, and some other parameters that affect the fracture, its value and location. The most known name for this ratio is "stress triaxiality" or "triaxiality" [8,12,[14][15][16]18]. The calculation of this value is realized in the QForm software:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ceretti et al modelled crack opening using a Latham and Cockroft ductile damage model [4,5]. In the following years, Fanini and coworkers produced an in-depth study of the Mannesmann effect [6][7][8][9][10], explained it by the occurrence of a tensile stress in the direction normal to the compression by the rolls in the cross section. They focused on the onset of crack opening mechanism and therefore omitted the piercer plug in their simulations for simplicity.…”
Section: Rotation Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They focused on the onset of crack opening mechanism and therefore omitted the piercer plug in their simulations for simplicity. Comparing several ductile damage models, they finally advocated a version of the Lemaitre model [8] and emphasized the impact of pre-existing porosity due to casting [6,9] or more generally of any metallurgical weakness or brittleness of the centreline of the billet. Starting from this conclusion, Skripalenko and coworkers recently studied the effect of the plug shape and more generally of the tooling on final shell porosity [11][12]; among the damage models, they promoted the normalized Latham and Cockroft one [13].…”
Section: Rotation Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the RTP process, the Hansel–Spittel law has been frequently used for the constitutive modelling of the billet material behaviour. Ghiotti and Fanini [ 23 , 24 , 25 ] modelled the flow stress of a DIN St52 steel in a skew rolling process with this formulation. Pschera et al [ 26 ] used this constitutive formulation for modelling the 10CrMo9-10 steel rheological behaviour during the RTP and the posterior analysis of material damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%