2013
DOI: 10.21660/2013.8.2118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the Axial Bearing Capacity of Piles by SPT-based and Numerical Design Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The static pile bearing capacity test (Igoe et al 2010;Adejumo 2013) is an expensive and time consuming procedure when compared with the dynamic method (O'Neill et al 1990) or the axial compressive force pulse test (Shooshpasha et al 2013). To perform the static test, one should install a costly axial load anchoring system of the tested pile or bring the ballast with mass or total force of reaction system larger than bearing capacity of the pile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static pile bearing capacity test (Igoe et al 2010;Adejumo 2013) is an expensive and time consuming procedure when compared with the dynamic method (O'Neill et al 1990) or the axial compressive force pulse test (Shooshpasha et al 2013). To perform the static test, one should install a costly axial load anchoring system of the tested pile or bring the ballast with mass or total force of reaction system larger than bearing capacity of the pile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, many traditional formulas had been proposed, which were mainly based on the in situ testing result of soil such as cone penetration test (CPT) and standard penetration test (SPT) [5][6][7][8][9]. In some other studies, the authors also used the finite element method to analyze the pile load and pile displacement relationship of [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for the pile load test method, although the percentage of reliability is high, it is time-consuming and costly and the equipment is often very cumbersome [15]. e dynamic method is highly dependent on the characteristics of the pile, the hammer, and the position of the pile to predict the bearing capacity of the pile without considering soil effects [11,16]. Last but not least, the characteristics of the numerical simulation method are finite-element-based; basically still approximate method and the results depend a lot on the modeling process [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pile foundation design, the axial pile bearing capacity (P u ) is considered one of the most critical parameters [ 1 ]. Throughout years of research and development, five main approaches to determine the pile bearing capacity have been adopted, namely the static analysis, dynamic analysis, dynamic testing, pile load testing, and in-situ testing [ 2 ]. It is needless to say each of the above methods possesses advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%