2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-021-01982-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of TBM Penetration Rate Using Fuzzy Logic, Particle Swarm Optimization and Harmony Search Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the variability of TBM tunneling parameters and the complexity of geological conditions (Feng et al, 2015;Feng et al, 2022;Yang et al, 2022), it is difficult to quantitatively analyze the interaction law between TBM and rock. Tunneling often relies on human experience to adjust repeatedly, and the real-time matching is poor, and it cannot adapt to the complex geological environment (Zhang et al, 2018a;Afradi et al, 2021). Therefore, accurate and effective real-time prediction of TBM tunneling parameters has become an urgent problem to be solved in the field of tunnel engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the variability of TBM tunneling parameters and the complexity of geological conditions (Feng et al, 2015;Feng et al, 2022;Yang et al, 2022), it is difficult to quantitatively analyze the interaction law between TBM and rock. Tunneling often relies on human experience to adjust repeatedly, and the real-time matching is poor, and it cannot adapt to the complex geological environment (Zhang et al, 2018a;Afradi et al, 2021). Therefore, accurate and effective real-time prediction of TBM tunneling parameters has become an urgent problem to be solved in the field of tunnel engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the effectiveness of the intelligent model was verified on Iranian road tunnels. Afradi A et al used the fuzzy logic method to predict the penetration rate of the tunnel boring machine, and the input parameters included compressive strength, density of the rock, and so on [ 14 ]. The results show that the prediction accuracy is better than the traditional mechanistic models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some promising research domains for machine learning in tunnelling are the geological prognosis ahead of the face, the interpretation of monitoring results, automation and maintenance [32]. At present, however, research appears to be focussed on the following topics: prediction of TBM operational parameters [34,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], penetration rate [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63], porewater pressure [64], ground settlement [65][66][67], disc cutter replacement [68][69][70], jamming risk [71,72] and geological classification [73][74][75][76]). Few authors estimated the face support pressure of TBMs with machine learning [35,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%