2003
DOI: 10.1029/2001jc001119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of surface currents and drifter trajectories on the inner Scotian Shelf

Abstract: [1] The predictive skill of a simple model of surface flow on the Scotian Shelf is assessed using oceanographic data collected in February 1996. The model is forced by wind stress, water density, and sea level along the open boundaries of the model domain.The skill of the model with respect to subtidal variations of alongshore current and bottom pressure is quantified by the ratio g 2 = Var(O À P)/Var(O), where Var(O À P) and Var(O) are the variance of the prediction errors and observations, respectively. Skil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because most drifter studies have been in oceanic settings and used much larger drifters, and because the USGS drifters used in this study are not a standard design, simulations were conducted for several leeway factors, within the range of reported leeway factors in the literature, and a leeway factor of 0.006 was chosen for the drifter simulations. This value is similar to values in the literature for multiple drifter designs (Thompson et al 2003) and consistent with the observed properties of the TRISTAR drifter studied by Niiler et al (1995), which bears some similarity to the USGS drifter but is much larger.…”
Section: Drifterssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because most drifter studies have been in oceanic settings and used much larger drifters, and because the USGS drifters used in this study are not a standard design, simulations were conducted for several leeway factors, within the range of reported leeway factors in the literature, and a leeway factor of 0.006 was chosen for the drifter simulations. This value is similar to values in the literature for multiple drifter designs (Thompson et al 2003) and consistent with the observed properties of the TRISTAR drifter studied by Niiler et al (1995), which bears some similarity to the USGS drifter but is much larger.…”
Section: Drifterssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For this reason, the drifter will be more strongly influenced by wind than the "kite" drogue region alone. To account for this effect, the horizontal drifter velocity is typically estimated (e.g., Thompson et al 2003) using the equation…”
Section: Driftersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1). The relative skill of each method was then quantified using the following calculation of γ 2 (Thompson et al, 2003):…”
Section: Discussion a Alternative Approaches For Future Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 also shows the 2 statistics for the four stations. It is the ratio of the variance of the hindcast errors to the variance of the observations [e.g., Thompson et al, 2003] …”
Section: Validation Of the Storm Surge Hindcastmentioning
confidence: 99%