2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of structural failure of tibial bone models under physiological loads: Effect of CT density–modulus relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be because, despite using different E-BMD equations for cortical and trabecular bones, we still extrapolate these equations for estimating the elastic modulus of voxels with BMD values off the reported range for each equation. Application of each BMD equation for the exact same range it has been proposed, in combination with a customized E-BMD equation for the uncertain mid-range BMD values, may lead to more accurate predictions using QCT-FE (Tuncer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be because, despite using different E-BMD equations for cortical and trabecular bones, we still extrapolate these equations for estimating the elastic modulus of voxels with BMD values off the reported range for each equation. Application of each BMD equation for the exact same range it has been proposed, in combination with a customized E-BMD equation for the uncertain mid-range BMD values, may lead to more accurate predictions using QCT-FE (Tuncer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the selected empirical relationships have been derived for very specific density ranges (trabecular not more than BMD = 0.39 g/cm 3 ; cortical not less than BMD = 0.80 g/cm 3 ). As such, customizing different E-BMD equations for the uncertain mid-range (0.39-0.80 g/cm 3 ) may improve the prediction ability and accuracy of the QCT-FE technique (Tuncer et al, 2014). Second, this study included an assumption of isotropy for both cortical and trabecular bone while both bone types have orthotropic material properties (Gray et al, 2008;Rho, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elastic modulus was assumed to be dependent on the apparent density, which was linearly related to the Hounsfield Units (HU) from the CT scans. Since the bones were not scanned alongside reference phantoms, we assumed that the 13‐bone average minimum HU (−174.5) corresponded to an apparent density of 0 g/cm 3 , and the 13‐bone average maximum Hounsfield Units (1731) corresponded to a density of 1.8 g/cc . The apparent density was then converted to elastic modulus by combining the empirical relationships from Morgan et al and Snyder and Schneider, which have been shown to adequately predict bone failure under daily activities and to correlate well with experimental data .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation 1 : An empirical relationship between bone density (g/cm 3 ) and radiographic greyscale (Hounsfield Units, HU ) used in this study, as derived from previous studies [34], [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%