2007
DOI: 10.13031/2013.22625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Soil-Bulldozer Blade Interaction Using Discrete Element Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Addressing these issues is imperative in advancing the field of soil-tool simulation using the DEM. Also, most existing studies focused on applications other than agriculture, for example bulldozing where soil was often cohessionless (Franco et al 2007;Obermayr et al 2011). Only few existing studies dealt with cohesive agricultural soil (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing these issues is imperative in advancing the field of soil-tool simulation using the DEM. Also, most existing studies focused on applications other than agriculture, for example bulldozing where soil was often cohessionless (Franco et al 2007;Obermayr et al 2011). Only few existing studies dealt with cohesive agricultural soil (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sieving method was used to measure the percentage of the grain size of ginseng soil samples, and the results showed that the percentage of soil with grain sizes of 0~2 mm, 2~4 mm, and greater than 4mm were 21.49%, 38%, and 45.51%, respectively, and that the soil texture belonged to sandy loam. In discrete element simulation, the multisphere method and particle size amplification method are regarded as simple, efficient, and cost-effective methods [19][20][21], so three-sphere and four-sphere particles are used to replace different shapes of soil particles to generate straight-line three-sphere particles, which accounted for 21.49% of the particles; triangular three-sphere particles accounted for 38%, and frontal body four-sphere particles accounted for 45.51%. The average moisture content of the soil layer from a 0 to 270 mm depth was measured as (23 ± 1%) by the oven drying method (KH-35AS drying box); the density of the soil was measured using the pycnometer method (volume 100 cm 3 ) to extract the soil and an electronic balance (range 500 g, accuracy 0.01 g); the test was repeated 6 times for the average value, and 1061.4 kg/m 3 was taken as the final parameter of the simulation.…”
Section: Selection Of Calibration Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental material property tests can be used for calibrations. For example, Franco et al (2007) and Coetzee and Els (2009) used direct shear tests to calibrate model micro properties of soil through matching simulated friction angles with measured angles of the soil. Sadek et al (2011) also used direct shear tests in calibrating some micro properties of hemp fibre and core (ground), and those calibrated micro properties were used in the simulations of this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%