2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.j058288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Separation-Induced Transition on the SD7003 Airfoil Using Algebraic Transition Triggering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(174 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors have noted that the computed Menter et al intermittency function at the wall γ w [18] and the Bernardos et al transition function f tr [13] exhibit interesting similar qualitative behaviors, as shown in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Proposed Model and Transition Detection Criterionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The authors have noted that the computed Menter et al intermittency function at the wall γ w [18] and the Bernardos et al transition function f tr [13] exhibit interesting similar qualitative behaviors, as shown in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Proposed Model and Transition Detection Criterionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…They obtained a correct estimation of the bubble length, but the minimum of the C f and the pressure recovery in the reattachment region were strongly underestimated. Bernardos et al proposed the LSTT κ − ω model based on a function f tr that boosted the production of the turbulent kinetic energy κ inside the bubble [13]. Excellent results were achieved.…”
Section: Proposed Model and Transition Detection Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simulation result obtained from LES-WALE simulation for unexcited airfoil was compared against the XFoil result with critical amplification factor N cr = 5. With XFoil, the transition to turbulent flow was predicted through e N method, and this N cr corresponds to turbulence intensity (Tu) of 0.371% through the relationship N cr = −8.43−2.4 * ln(Tu%/100%) [23].…”
Section: Validation Of Results For Unexcited Airfoilmentioning
confidence: 99%