2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/904701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Sentinel Node Status and Clinical Outcome in a Melanoma Centre

Abstract: Background. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard procedure for patients with localized cutaneous melanoma. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Melanoma Panel has reinforced the status of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) as an important prognostic factor for melanoma survival. We sought to identify predictive factors associated with a positive SLNB and overall survival in our population. Methods. We performed a retrospective chart review of 221 patients who have done a successful SLNB for m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the predominant cause of treatment failure is distant metastases, the research should focus on a systemic adjuvant treatment. Our own results on that issue are in accordance with the results obtained by other authors, who have indicated that the presence of metastatic nodes is a strong unfavorable prognostic factor (Callery et al, 1982;Barnhill et al, 1996;White et al, 2002;Scaggins et al, 2010;Mervic, 2012;Teixeira et al, 2013;Deshmane et al, 2014). We were not able to reveal any detailed features that characterize nodal metastases and are potentially related to prognosis (e.g., node size, extracapsular extension, ratio of number of metastatic to resected nodes).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the predominant cause of treatment failure is distant metastases, the research should focus on a systemic adjuvant treatment. Our own results on that issue are in accordance with the results obtained by other authors, who have indicated that the presence of metastatic nodes is a strong unfavorable prognostic factor (Callery et al, 1982;Barnhill et al, 1996;White et al, 2002;Scaggins et al, 2010;Mervic, 2012;Teixeira et al, 2013;Deshmane et al, 2014). We were not able to reveal any detailed features that characterize nodal metastases and are potentially related to prognosis (e.g., node size, extracapsular extension, ratio of number of metastatic to resected nodes).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Wojciech Majewski 1 *, Karolina Stanienda 2 , Katarzyna Wicherska 2 , Rafal Ulczok 3 , Jerzy Wydmanski 1 local lymph nodes at the time of initial diagnosis (White et al, 2002;Scaggins et al, 2010;Mervic L, 2012;Teixeira et al, 2013;Deshmane et al, 2014) Because the clinical course of malignant melanoma is difficult to predict, it seems important to evaluate the clinical factors that may influence the prognosis. Such an assessment on a local population is recommended because the death rates due to malignant skin melanoma among Poles are significantly (up to 20%) higher than the average for the European Union (Wojciechowska and Didkowska, 2015).…”
Section: Treatment Outcome and Prognostic Factors For Malignant Skin Melanoma Treated With Radical Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10‐year melanoma‐specific survival (MSS) for SLN‐positive patients was 62%, versus 85% for SLN‐negative patients (level of evidence III). Many large retrospective studies have also demonstrated the pre‐eminence of an SLNB in risk stratification, with all but one showing the status of the SLN to be the most significant predictor of MSS (HR 1.5–6.9) …”
Section: Slnb For Optimal Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breslow thickness is also an independent predictor of sentinel lymph node (SLN) status [ 6 ]. In a retrospective review of 221 patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy, there is SLN positive rate of 4.8% in T1 patients, 11.2% in T2 patients, 28.1% in T3 patients, and 46.5% in T4 patients [ 6 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breslow thickness is also an independent predictor of sentinel lymph node (SLN) status [ 6 ]. In a retrospective review of 221 patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy, there is SLN positive rate of 4.8% in T1 patients, 11.2% in T2 patients, 28.1% in T3 patients, and 46.5% in T4 patients [ 6 ]. Further data supports performing sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for microscopic staging of the regional lymph node basin when tumour thickness meets or exceeds 1 mm, or greater than or equal to 0.75 mm with other high risk features such as ulceration and/or high mitotic activity [ 7 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%