2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of sensory quality in raw carrots (Daucus carota L.) using multi-block LS-ParPLS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall carrot/harsh/ink‐like category had higher Q 2 values than the fruity/fresh/sweet category. These observations agreed with those of a previous study in which the “cross‐validated explained sensory variance” ( Q 2 in this study) for bitterness and green flavor was 62.30% and 66.03%, respectively, while the result for sweetness was 44.64%, based on multiblock LS‐ParPLS (Kreutzmann and others ). The profiles in the present study did not consider the sweetness of sugar; however, similar values were obtained.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall carrot/harsh/ink‐like category had higher Q 2 values than the fruity/fresh/sweet category. These observations agreed with those of a previous study in which the “cross‐validated explained sensory variance” ( Q 2 in this study) for bitterness and green flavor was 62.30% and 66.03%, respectively, while the result for sweetness was 44.64%, based on multiblock LS‐ParPLS (Kreutzmann and others ). The profiles in the present study did not consider the sweetness of sugar; however, similar values were obtained.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…PCA showed that the sensory attributes could be divided into 3 categories for the carrot varieties, that is, sour/green, overall carrot/harsh/ink‐like, and fruity/fresh/sweet. However, previous reports of carrot sensory attributes have shown that harshness, bitterness, and terpene flavors were inversely correlated to sweetness (Varming and others ; Kreutzmann and others , b), we found that 2 categories of overall carrot/harsh/ink‐like and fruity/fresh/sweet both contributed positively to the PC1 score. In this study, we determined the contributions of carrot volatiles to the characteristic aromas of carrots by allowing the sensory panelists to evaluate only the carrot aromas/odors represented by volatiles so that the sweet components such as sugar had no effects on the sweet notes.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Moreover, abiotic factors, such as mechanical stress, is reported to increase the amounts of the key bitter tastants, members of the C17-polycetylenes, present in native carrots (Daucus carota L.) to efficiently high concentrations, causing a bitter off-flavor is perceived, occurring especially often during the production process for infant diet carrot products [79,80,[91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98]. In addition, a decrease in flavor quality accompanied by an increase in bitter taste has also been reported in raw hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.) upon biotic stress challenges, such as upon infection by bugs, belonging to the hemipteran family, like Gonocerus acuteangulatus and Coreus marginatus [99].…”
Section: Sensomics -A Phenotyping Tool To Characterize Crops Flavor Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, from the scientific point of view, the evaluation of sensory quality is complicated, because it is a complex concept which contains both objective and subjective dimensions (Lawless 1995;Kreutzmann et al 2008b). Among analytical methods, profiling techniques are used to describe the sensory properties of a product and the range of variation in the sensory quality.…”
Section: Sensory Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%