The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.09.006
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of self-reported knowledge with over-claiming, fluid and crystallized intelligence and typical intellectual engagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the knowledge and awareness of Q fever could be expected to be lower in the greater population of veterinary workers, particularly veterinary nurses. Additionally, self-reported levels of knowledge tend to be over-claimed [ 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the knowledge and awareness of Q fever could be expected to be lower in the greater population of veterinary workers, particularly veterinary nurses. Additionally, self-reported levels of knowledge tend to be over-claimed [ 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a completed study on longitudinal student achievement (Hülür et al, 2011a,b), N = 112 German students from the beginning of 9th grade until the end of 10th grade completed a 120 min test battery on student achievement and working memory. Over a period of 2 years, students participated in 40 test sessions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only will low CA individuals understand less of what the doctor tells them, but they may also give the impression that they understand to facilitate social interaction. Empirically, low CA is associated with a tendency to over-claim knowledge [41]. Perhaps the unsatisfactory present state of secondary prevention partly reflects a mismatch between standard post-MI care and individual differences in patient CA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%