2002
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of seasonal snow accumulation in cold climate forests

Abstract: Pomeroy, J. W., Gray, D. M., Hedstrom, N. R., Janowicz, J. R. (2002). Prediction of seasonal snow accumulation in cold climate forests. Hydrological Processes, 16(18), 3543-3558. 59th Eastern Snow Conference (ESC), Stowe, Vermont, 5-7 June 2002.Accumulation of snow under forest canopies is known to decline with increasing canopy density and leaf area because of snow interception and sublimation in the canopy. Seasonal snow accumulation measurements, collected over a decade from various forest stands in western… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
221
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
221
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The typical mountain environment includes dense boreal forest at lower elevations, sparse forest, open meadow and shrub tundra at the higher elevations, and exposed alpine areas with mostly bare rock at the highest elevations. WCB and WCF are situated at two different areas of tall shrub tundra (Pomeroy et al, 2006) and mature white spruce forest (Pomeroy et al, 2002), respectively. The subarctic continental climate is characterized by a large variation in air temperature, low relative humidity, and relatively low precipitation (Wahl et al, 1987).…”
Section: Sites and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical mountain environment includes dense boreal forest at lower elevations, sparse forest, open meadow and shrub tundra at the higher elevations, and exposed alpine areas with mostly bare rock at the highest elevations. WCB and WCF are situated at two different areas of tall shrub tundra (Pomeroy et al, 2006) and mature white spruce forest (Pomeroy et al, 2002), respectively. The subarctic continental climate is characterized by a large variation in air temperature, low relative humidity, and relatively low precipitation (Wahl et al, 1987).…”
Section: Sites and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interactions between topographic variables and vegetation are most likely attributable to the under-canopy snowpack being less sensitive to solar radiation versus snowpack in the open area (Courbaud et al, 2003;Dubayah, 1994;Essery et al, 2008;Musselman et al, 2008Musselman et al, , 2012. In spite of filtering the topographic effect, there is still about a 20 cm magnitude of fluctuation in the snow-depth difference, which might be attributed to various clearing sizes of open area at different locations and various vegetation types in forests Pomeroy et al, 2002;Schmidt and Gluns, 1991); however, we were not able to explore these features of the sites from the current lidar data set. …”
Section: Vegetation Effects On Snow Distribution Along Elevationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…California's multi-billion-dollar agricultural economy as well as multi-trillion-dollar urban economy depend on these predictions (California Department of Water Resources, 2013). Both topographic and vegetation factors are important in influencing the snowpack conditions, as they closely interact with meteorological conditions to affect precipitation and snow distribution in the mountains (McMillen, 1988;Raupach, 1991;Wigmosta et al, 1994). However, mountain precipitation is poorly understood at multiple spatial scales because it is governed by processes that are neither well measured nor accurately predicted (Kirchner et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is the air emissivity, is the fractional cloud cover, is the fractional canopy cover (estimated from following (Liston and Elder, 2006;Pomeroy et al, 2002)), is the canopy emissivity (assumed equal to 1 following Sicart et al (2004)), and is the canopy temperature (°C) which is assumed equal to following DeWalle and Rango (2008).…”
Section: Rti Snowpack Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%