“…In addition, thermodynamic methods are much more amenable to modeling comprehensive 2-D GC (GC × GC) separations when compared to the isovolatility curve generation methods that are required for use of the retention index in the second dimension of a GC × GC separation [7,19]. In the literature, a number of studies to predict retention time using thermodynamic-based models have been reported [1,5,7,[10][11][12][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, there is room for improvement, especially with regard to translation of retention time predictions across columns (of the same stationary phase chemistry) with varying geometries, and translation between different instruments.…”