1992
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/56.5.848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of resting energy expenditure from fat-free mass and fat mass

Abstract: On the basis of literature values, the relationship between fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM), and resting energy expenditure [REE (kJ/24 h)] was determined for 213 adults (86 males, 127 females). The objectives were to develop a mathematical model to predict REE based on body composition and to evaluate the contribution of FFM and FM to REE. The following regression equations were derived: 1) REE = 1265 + (93.3 x FFM) (r2 = 0.727, P < 0.001); 2) REE = 1114 + (90.4 x FFM) + (13.2 x FM) (R2 = 0.743, P < 0.001)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
242
8
12

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
15
242
8
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship of age and gender with metabolic rates disappeared after adjustment for fat mass and fat-free mass, except for SMR-8h. Similar results have been reported showing that the effect of age and gender on metabolic rates is mainly due to fat-free mass (Ravussin et al, 1986;Astrup et al, 1990;Cunningham, 1991;Nelson et al, 1992) and fat mass (Dionne et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The relationship of age and gender with metabolic rates disappeared after adjustment for fat mass and fat-free mass, except for SMR-8h. Similar results have been reported showing that the effect of age and gender on metabolic rates is mainly due to fat-free mass (Ravussin et al, 1986;Astrup et al, 1990;Cunningham, 1991;Nelson et al, 1992) and fat mass (Dionne et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Despite the significant differences we observed in PAL between young and elderly subjects, these were very small (elderly vs younger women: 1.69 vs 1.64; elderly vs younger men: 1.66 vs 1.70) and PAL was not a significant predictor of RMR in our subjects. The influence of FM, body fat distribution, PAL and smoking on RMR has been discussed in detail elsewhere (Hofstetter et al, 1986;Weststrate et al, 1990;Moffat & Owens, 1991;Leenen et al, 1992;Nelson et al, 1992;Svendsen et al, 1993;Pannemans & Westerterp, 1995;Ryan et al, 1996;Withers et al, 1998;Nielsen et al, 2000;Kimm et al, 2001;Lührmann et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When regression models are used, the contribution of fat mass appears to be around 0.15-0.2 of the contribution of the same mass of lean tissue. 24,25 Studies in humans show that in this species as well, fat mass makes a contribution to EE that is a 0.15-0.2, 5,26,27 or a greater 28 proportion of that of the equivalent lean mass.…”
Section: Comparison Of Energy Expenditure In Lean and Obese Animalsmentioning
confidence: 94%