The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Renal Prognosis in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Using PKD1/PKD2 Mutations

Abstract: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients with PKD1 mutations, particularly those with truncating mutations, show poor prognosis. However, the differences in disease progression with different mutation types are unclear. Here, a comparative study was conducted on the renal prognosis of patients with ADPKD who were categorized based on genotype (PKD1 versus PKD2 mutation), mutation type (truncating mutation: nonsense, frameshift, splicing mutation, and large deletion; non-truncating mutation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Japanese patients [47] ( Although several methods for measuring TKV have been developed, two methods using stereology (TKVs) and ellipsoid equation (TKVe) are widely used. TKVs and TKVe were strongly correlated [49].…”
Section: Table 3 Mutation Frequency Between Different Adpkd Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Japanese patients [47] ( Although several methods for measuring TKV have been developed, two methods using stereology (TKVs) and ellipsoid equation (TKVe) are widely used. TKVs and TKVe were strongly correlated [49].…”
Section: Table 3 Mutation Frequency Between Different Adpkd Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 shows the comparison of mutation frequencies between HOPE-PKD and other large cohorts. Korean ADPKD cohort showed similar proportion of PKD1 PT and PKD1 NT [ 36 , 38 , 39 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Assessment Of the Rapid Progression Of Kidney Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the treatment of patients in real clinical settings requires multifaceted and comprehensive judgments based on abundant medical information, it is meaningful to examine various cutoff values in various sub-cohorts, at various follow-up periods, especially for important prognostic factors. Indeed, the appropriate cutoff value for a risk factor can depend on the handling of the risk factor [ 43 , 44 , 45 ], the cohort evaluated [ 43 , 44 , 46 , 47 ], and the observation period [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, considering that multifaceted and comprehensive judgments based on abundant medical information are required in the treatment of patients in real clinical settings, there is merit in evaluating various cut-off values in various sub-cohorts, at various follow-up periods, for prognostic factors of importance. In fact, the adequate cut-off value for a risk factor depends on the handling of the risk factor [38][39][40], the cohort evaluated [38,39,41,42], and the observation period [19,21]. Fat distribution generally differs between the sexes; men have relatively more visceral fat and women have relatively more subcutaneous fat.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%