2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2007
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2007.4424488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of protein interactions by combining genetic algorithm with SVM method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, many machine learning methods have been developed or adopted, such as those using support vector machine (SVM) [ 16 , 17 , 19 - 22 ], neural network [ 13 - 15 , 23 , 24 ], genetic algorithm [ 25 , 26 ], hidden Markov models [ 27 ], Bayesian networks [ 28 , 29 ], random forests [ 30 , 31 ], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, many machine learning methods have been developed or adopted, such as those using support vector machine (SVM) [ 16 , 17 , 19 - 22 ], neural network [ 13 - 15 , 23 , 24 ], genetic algorithm [ 25 , 26 ], hidden Markov models [ 27 ], Bayesian networks [ 28 , 29 ], random forests [ 30 , 31 ], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second category is the machine learning–based method, which also can be divided into supervised learning and semi-supervised learning ( Cai et al, 2018 ; Chen et al, 2018a ). All the supervised learning methods such as Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) ( Wang et al, 2007b ), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), and Neural Network (NN) ( Gao et al, 2021 ) require both positive and negative samples for training ( Chen et al, 2018a ). In contrast, the semi-supervised learning-based methods can train the model without negative samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed tool was applied to a dataset extracted using HINT-KB (http://150.140.142:84) which is a publicly available database for Human PPI data. In order to test its efficiency we compared it with two modern PPI prediction methods: A Random Forest method [3][4][5][6] and the wrapper methodology combining Genetic Algorithms and SVM Classifiers [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%