2003
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Abstract: BACKGROUNDThe objective of the current study was to develop an algorithm to predict progression to metastases after radical nephrectomy for patients with clinically localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to allow stratification of patients for potential adjuvant therapy trials.METHODSThe authors identified 1671 sporadic patients with clinically localized, unilateral clear cell RCC who underwent radical nephrectomy between 1970 and 2000. The clinical features examined included age, gender, smoking history, recent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
456
1
15

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 698 publications
(490 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
456
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…One of these models, the SSIGN score, uses pathologic features predictive of cancer-specific survival in CCRCC: tumor size, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, nuclear grade, and tumor necrosis (13). The second model uses the same pathologic features, except the outcome assessed is metastasis-free survival and not cancer-specific survival (14). The pathologic features required for these models are obtained from the nephrectomy No pT1a pNx pM0 55 ANED NAG P 99 99 NAG-2 3.6 2 No pTa pNx pM0 52 ANED NAG N, P 99 99 NAG-3 3.5 2 No pT1a pNx pM0 41 ANED NAG N, P 99 99 NAG-4 2.8 2 No pT1a pNx pM0 45 ANED NAG P 99 99 NAG-5 5.8 2 No pT1b pNx pM0 36 ANED NAG P 95 95 NAG-6 4.5 2 No pT1b pNx pM0 36 ANED NAG P 99 99 NAG-7 7 2 No pT1b pN0 pM0 36 ANED NAG P 95 95 NAG-8 3 1 No pT1a pNx pM0 11 ANED NAG N, P 99 99 NAG-9 7 1 No pT1b pNx pM0 12 ANED NAG N, P 95 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these models, the SSIGN score, uses pathologic features predictive of cancer-specific survival in CCRCC: tumor size, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, nuclear grade, and tumor necrosis (13). The second model uses the same pathologic features, except the outcome assessed is metastasis-free survival and not cancer-specific survival (14). The pathologic features required for these models are obtained from the nephrectomy No pT1a pNx pM0 55 ANED NAG P 99 99 NAG-2 3.6 2 No pTa pNx pM0 52 ANED NAG N, P 99 99 NAG-3 3.5 2 No pT1a pNx pM0 41 ANED NAG N, P 99 99 NAG-4 2.8 2 No pT1a pNx pM0 45 ANED NAG P 99 99 NAG-5 5.8 2 No pT1b pNx pM0 36 ANED NAG P 95 95 NAG-6 4.5 2 No pT1b pNx pM0 36 ANED NAG P 99 99 NAG-7 7 2 No pT1b pN0 pM0 36 ANED NAG P 95 95 NAG-8 3 1 No pT1a pNx pM0 11 ANED NAG N, P 99 99 NAG-9 7 1 No pT1b pNx pM0 12 ANED NAG N, P 95 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leibovich and colleagues [20] from the Mayo Clinic developed an alternative algorithm to predict progression to metastatic RCC in patients with clinically localized clear cell RCC after RN (at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years). The features in this model included pT and pN stage (2002 AJCC), tumor size (<10 vs. ≥10 cm), nuclear grade, and the presence of tumor necrosis.…”
Section: Prognosis and Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of metastasis at diagnosis 20-30% and solitary metastasis is found in 5% of the patients [2,3]. Metastasis is a strong predictor of bad prognosis [4], 5 years survival rates are reported as less than 10% [5,6]. Early detection and management of metastatic disease is crucial to improve prognosis and quality of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%