2020
DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2020.25158.1762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Preeclampsia by Measuring of Mean Platelet Volume and Platelet Distribution Width

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MPV was significantly increased in group I than group II at 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 37 weeks. This was in line with Mahmoud et al [15] who showed that the MPV was higher in preeclampsia patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MPV was significantly increased in group I than group II at 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 37 weeks. This was in line with Mahmoud et al [15] who showed that the MPV was higher in preeclampsia patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…At cut-off >10.4 of PDW to predict PE, sensitivity was 88.89, specificity was 54.95, PPV was 16.3, NPV was 98.0, AUC was 0.764 and P value was 0.002. This was in line with Tesfay et al (2019) [7] who found that PDW can differentiate NT pregnant women from preeclamptic pregnant women at a cut off value >10.85fl with sensitivity of 72.2%, specificity of 52.1%, PPV of 46.0 %, NPV of 76.8% and AUC (0.625).This wasn't in line with Mahmoud et al (2020) [15] who showed that the PDW was higher in preeclampsia patients and the cut-off value of PDW was above 17.7, it showed a high specificity of 93.3% and a sensitivity of 96% with a p < 0.0001.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%