1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1987.tb05456.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of post-concussional sequelae by reaction time test

Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine whether it was possible by a reaction time (RT) test to predict if a patient was to complain of sequelae after a cerebral concussion. 55 patients had an RT test performed 1-5 days after concussion. The test showed a significant (P less than 0.02) prolongated RT in patients having postconcussional sequelae (median 186 ms) after 1 month (27 patients, 49%) compared to the patients without sequelae (median 168 ms). Patients with sequelae after 3 months (12 patients, 22%) also h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuropsychologial measures such as paragraph recall tests have similarly shown little correlation with PCS'9 and reaction time tasks have shown both no relation20 and positive correlation. 17 More consistent findings have come from measures of divided attention. The paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT)21 and Stroop test22 have both been shown to directly mirror the level of PCS reported during the recovery period.2'25 Neither of these tests, however, was able to predict early on those King patients likely to experience persisting symptoms three months after injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Neuropsychologial measures such as paragraph recall tests have similarly shown little correlation with PCS'9 and reaction time tasks have shown both no relation20 and positive correlation. 17 More consistent findings have come from measures of divided attention. The paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT)21 and Stroop test22 have both been shown to directly mirror the level of PCS reported during the recovery period.2'25 Neither of these tests, however, was able to predict early on those King patients likely to experience persisting symptoms three months after injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Most surveys that have been conducted of this syndrome identify headache as the primary problem (Alves et al, 1993;Brown et al, 1994;Edna & Cappelen, 1987;Evans, 2004;Jacobsen et al, 1987;Middleboe et al, 1992;Rutherford, 1979). Painrelated impairment of function may be most important in cases of postconcussive syndrome (PCS).…”
Section: Painmentioning
confidence: 99%