2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of phase stabilities of solid solutions for high entropy alloys

K.X. Yin,
Z.W. Huang,
B.L. Wu
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This integration facilitates the rapid synthesis and testing of novel alloy compositions, thereby accelerating the pace of materials discovery and innovation. It allows for a more efficient exploration of the vast compositional landscape of HEAs, pinpointing optimal combinations of elements that meet specific performance criteria [45,[110][111][112][113][114].…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This integration facilitates the rapid synthesis and testing of novel alloy compositions, thereby accelerating the pace of materials discovery and innovation. It allows for a more efficient exploration of the vast compositional landscape of HEAs, pinpointing optimal combinations of elements that meet specific performance criteria [45,[110][111][112][113][114].…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the types of intermetallic compounds, within HEAs, there are generally considered to be two distinct types of intermetallic compounds, those with similar lattice structures to the primary matrix (such as B2 or L12 phases) and those with more complex lattice structures (such as Laves and Sigma phases), which can have different formation criteria and impact on the alloy's properties [216]. As such, performing a prediction of the formation of intermetallic compounds within HEAs without considering the nature of the formed compounds deprives the model of relevant information regarding their formation, thus limiting the usefulness of the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%