2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c03233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Phase Behavior of CO2 Absorbents Using Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents (COSMO-RS): An Approach to Identify Phase Separation Solvents of Amine/Ether/Water Systems upon CO2 Absorption

Abstract: Developing energy-saving absorbents for carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) is essential for improving carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. Recently, we have designed phase separation solvents, which can significantly reduce the regeneration energy for CO 2 capture and separation down to 1.6 GJ/ton-CO 2 et al. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control2018, 75, 1−7]. For further developing better solvents, this paper studied a theoretical approach with conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) to screen t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We set one reaction for CO 2 capture. Since the developed solvent did not contain water, the ionic species were assumed to occur as a neutral ion pair and could be counted as one molecule. Our previous work, such as Walden plots and COSMO calculations, supports this assumption. Vapor pressure or vapor–liquid equilibrium was estimated from the molecular structure (UNIFAC model).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We set one reaction for CO 2 capture. Since the developed solvent did not contain water, the ionic species were assumed to occur as a neutral ion pair and could be counted as one molecule. Our previous work, such as Walden plots and COSMO calculations, supports this assumption. Vapor pressure or vapor–liquid equilibrium was estimated from the molecular structure (UNIFAC model).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The solution was adjusted with a 30 wt % MEA aqueous solution and EAE/DEGMME = 30/70 (wt %). Our laboratory has been developing phase-separated absorbers that consist of EAE/diethylene glycol diethyl ether (DEGDEE)/water = 30/60/10 (wt %) and show a large solubility gap for the temperature swing process. We also proposed a hydrogen stripping process that can reduce the CO 2 partial pressure at the desorber and can reduce the regeneration temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To replace traditional mechanistic models, many researchers turned to the quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) model. In QSPR, the quantitative relationship among the physicochemical properties, biological properties, and molecular structures of compounds is explored with various statistical methods and mathematical models. , Usually, the molecular descriptors were selected as inputs of the models . In previous studies, the main methods used in the QSPR model include multivariable linear regression (MLR), artificial neural network (ANN), Gaussian process (GP), and support vector machine (SVM). , However, the complex correlation between molecular descriptors and high-dimensional nonlinear data required for dissolution prediction poses great difficulties in traditional machine learning methods …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the first principle approaches seem to be attractive, even if prediction accuracies are only semi-quantitative or qualitative [ 55 , 65 , 66 ] Among many of them the COSMO-RS methodology [ 67 ], is a very powerful tool applied for predicting various physicochemical properties using exclusively information of the chemical formula. In addition to many molecular affinity-related properties such as activity coefficients [ 68 , 69 ], equilibrium constants [ 70 , 71 , 72 ], cocrystals and solvates screening [ 10 , 11 , 67 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 ], phase diagrams [ 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 ], solubility in neat and multicomponent solvents [ 18 , 33 , 40 , 45 , 55 , 61 , 74 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 ], solubility parameters estimation [ 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 ] and partition coefficients [ 92 , 100 ,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%