2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Phakic Intraocular Lens Vault Using Machine Learning of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 A recent study showed that traditional machine learning methods are expected to improve the accuracy of ICL vault prediction. 11 However, all ICL surgery cases cannot be the gold standard for training machine learning models. Several cases may be considered as outliers with incorrect lens selection and measurement noises, and these factors can lead to the incorrect fitting of a given machine learning model and reduce the performance in the validation sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 A recent study showed that traditional machine learning methods are expected to improve the accuracy of ICL vault prediction. 11 However, all ICL surgery cases cannot be the gold standard for training machine learning models. Several cases may be considered as outliers with incorrect lens selection and measurement noises, and these factors can lead to the incorrect fitting of a given machine learning model and reduce the performance in the validation sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicting the optimal ICL vault is essential, especially when considering the safety of ICL surgery. It has been demonstrated that the ideal ICL vault is identical to the central corneal thickness (approximately 500 lm) [10,15,16]. There are still ongoing concerns about selecting the optimal ICL size, even when we employ the recommended ICL sizing nomogram provided by the ICL manufacturer, based on the white-towhite distance and the anterior chamber depth measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We described the details of the surgical procedures in our previous reports [4,[13][14][15][16]. In brief, on the day of surgery, dilating and topical anesthetic agents were applied.…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a combination of high myopia, high vault, and poor accommodative amplitude is present, the patient may face difficulties in focusing on near objects. Currently, apart from the manufacturer's sizing method, which uses the WTW and ACD as biometric features for the lens size selection, there are alternative methods that use biometric parameters, such as the anterior chamber width, the sulcus-to-sulcus, and the crystalline lens rise, aiming to estimate the vault [23,26,27]. Reinstein et al [2] showed that when using a sizing technique based on the sulcus-to-sulcus distance, the vault range could be reduced compared to the WTW method; other studies have provided methodologies for narrowing the vault range [8,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the 95% confidence intervals of the differences, if −18.0 DS (the most myopic ICL) was calculated using the predicted vault, the postoperative refractive error associated with vault error would be lower than 0.40 DS (when using the NK formula). While it is not possible to narrow down the vault error, at the moment of selecting the ICL power, the surgeon should consider the expected vault for the ICL size chosen (26,27) and select the ICL power by combining the predicted postoperative refraction, calculated by the manufacturer, and the expected postoperative refraction, induced by the expected lens position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%