Prediction of particle deposition around the cabin air supply nozzles of commercial airplanes using measured in-cabin particle emission rates

Abstract

Enhanced soiling on the surfaces around air supply nozzles due to particle deposition is frequently observed in commercial airliners. The problem is worsened by severe outdoor air pollution and flight delays in China. The particles in an aircraft cabin originate from both outdoor and in-cabin sources. This study conducted measurements on multiple commercial flights to obtain particle emission rates from in-cabin sources. Additional experiments on a retired MD-82 airplane provided justification of the in-flight measurements. The in-cabin sources emitted more particles during boarding/deplaning than during meal servicing and sitting. The average PM2.5 emission rates were 7.2, 2.6, 1.9, and 1.8 (μg/min per person), respectively, during the boarding/deplaning, sitting on the ground, sitting in the air, and meal servicing. The corresponding PM10 emission rates were 15.4, 6.1, 5.3, and 5.4 (μg/min per person), respectively, for these four periods. The average particle emission rate from in-cabin sources varied seasonally and was the highest in winter. With the measured data, this investigation used a CFD model to predict the accumulation of particles deposited around the nozzles of an airplane, taking into account the flight routes and the outdoor particle concentrations at the airports where the airplanes were parked. For the most polluted airplane in China, the dirty spots/areas around the nozzles inside the airplane became visible after 6 months. The method proposed in this study can be used for any commercial airplane to predict the accumulation of particles deposited around the air supply nozzles.

Decontamination of respirators amid shortages due to SARS-CoV-2

“…Lin et al also found that pressure dropped in all examined electret masks after ethanol decontamination. In another study, they examined the relative survival (RS) of Bacillus subtilis spores on N95 FFRs under worst-case temperature and relative humidity conditions and 70% ethanol resulted in 22% of RS in 24 h which was decayed from the initial RS of 73% [ 23 ]. The conclusion that may be drawn from the results of the studies above is that ethanol decontamination can effectively inactivate coronavirus on inanimate surfaces, but when applied to FFRs, it may lower biocidal efficacy and degrade the filter quality.…”

Efficacy and safety of decontamination for N95 respirator reuse: a systematic literature search and narrative synthesis

“…26 In a study of heating a contaminated mask for 15 min at 121°C at 103 kPa, there was near 100% sterilization of bacteria (using B. subtilis spores), but virus survival was not evaluated. 27 Steam alone is successful at decontaminating from avian coronavirus. 20 …”

Exploring the potential of electrostatic precipitation as an alternative particulate matter filtration system in aircraft cabins

“…They even proposed an emission rate of PM 10 per passenger of ~15 µg m −3 pax −1 during boarding/deplaning, and ~5-6 µg m −3 pax −1 while sitting. 20 Finally, passengers are also a source of bioaerosol.…”

“…Cao et al recently showed a higher particle concentration in the cabin during boarding and deplaning of a commercial aircraft. They even proposed an emission rate of PM 10 per passenger of ~15 µg m −3 pax −1 during boarding/deplaning, and ~5–6 µg m −3 pax −1 while sitting 20 . Finally, passengers are also a source of bioaerosol.…”