2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Outcomes after Heart Transplantation Using Machine Learning Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ML models have been applied in HT with promising results. 13,14 The previously published International Heart Transplant Survival Algorithm (IHTSA) was based on a flexible, nonlinear artificial neural network to predict survival after HT, included over 56 000 adult patients who underwent HT from 1994 to 2010 with a reported AUC .65 for 1-year survival. 25 The analysis identified recipient age, type of heart disease, history of prior transplantation, and mechanical ventilation before transplantation and donor age, cause of death, sex, and diabetes as important predictors of mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ML models have been applied in HT with promising results. 13,14 The previously published International Heart Transplant Survival Algorithm (IHTSA) was based on a flexible, nonlinear artificial neural network to predict survival after HT, included over 56 000 adult patients who underwent HT from 1994 to 2010 with a reported AUC .65 for 1-year survival. 25 The analysis identified recipient age, type of heart disease, history of prior transplantation, and mechanical ventilation before transplantation and donor age, cause of death, sex, and diabetes as important predictors of mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Recently, the application of ML algorithms to predict outcomes after HT has shown some promising results compared to traditionally derived risk scores. 13,14 However, further work is needed to determine the role of ML in the prediction of outcomes and risk stratification of HT patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results from ML models in pediatric transplantation across kidney, liver, and heart recipients from one center were similarly suboptimal [14]. In adult populations, predictive validity with ML approaches has not achieved better results [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Many of these studies have focused only on mortality in adult HT, offering little insight for transplant teams managing instances of other important outcomes like rejection and hospitalization in the years following transplantation in pediatric patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient medical factors also included weight, a history of prior malignancies, and creatine levels. These medical factors have been similarly identi ed in prior research using machine-learning approaches in other transplant data, including adult populations [14,27,[31][32][33].…”
Section: Model Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Typical tasks that are performed with the models implemented with AutoML are classification tasks. For example, it was used in the health sector [28,30,31], the corporate sector [32], the environmental sector [33,34], the energy sector [35,36], and others [37][38][39]. There are many AutoML tools and solutions available today to help data scientists.…”
Section: Automated Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%