2012
DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2012.8.3.224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury Using Clinical and Neuroimaging Variables

Abstract: Background and PurposeThe functional outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) varies widely. The aim of this study was to identify the factors predicting outcome following TBI.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled acute TBI patients, and assessed them clinically and radiologically using brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Functional outcome was measured using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 3 months after TBI. A GOS score of ≤4 was regarded as an unfavorable outcome. We performed multivariate analysis to inve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Recent studies have focused on MRI findings as predictors of clinical out-come because of its high sensitivity for the detection of nonhemorrhagic contusions, brainstem lesions, and diffuse axonal injuries. 17,18,[23][24][25][26] MRI analysis and grading reported in this study appear to have clinical relevance because of their significant correlation with outcome. This study used a grading system modified from human medicine, where the severity and location of the lesions were taken into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…22 Recent studies have focused on MRI findings as predictors of clinical out-come because of its high sensitivity for the detection of nonhemorrhagic contusions, brainstem lesions, and diffuse axonal injuries. 17,18,[23][24][25][26] MRI analysis and grading reported in this study appear to have clinical relevance because of their significant correlation with outcome. This study used a grading system modified from human medicine, where the severity and location of the lesions were taken into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this first category, all patients with DAI were included to determine the prognosis for this entire group of patients. Articles describing outcome in patients with DAI in the acute and subacute phase after injury were included, which resulted in 13 articles describing a total of 549 patients with a mean age of 33.5 years (4,9,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). DAI was present in 449 patients, and an unfavourable outcome was found in 38% (n = 169, 95% CI 0.33-0.42).…”
Section: Outcome Dai In Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] With mild TBIs (mTBIs), people typically experience a range of short-term postconcussive symptoms (PCSs) that usually resolve in the first few months after an injury; however, a substantial minority report experiencing long-term problems. [5][6][7] Moderate-to-severe injuries, on the other hand, are generally associated with poorer outcomes, [8][9][10][11][12] although outcomes can vary appreciably between injuries that are ostensibly similar in severity. 13,14 Consequently, it remains difficult to accurately predict outcomes at an individual, rather than group, level on the basis of injury severity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%