2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of oesophageal varices in hepatic cirrhosis by simple serum non-invasive markers: Results of a multicenter, large-scale study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
86
4
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
86
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Rev esp enfeRm Dig 2017;109(1): [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, albumin, and bilirubin, as well as in the VL. No differences were found in the INR value (Table II).…”
Section: Hypertension In Cirrhotic Hcv Patients Treated With Antiviramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rev esp enfeRm Dig 2017;109(1): [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, albumin, and bilirubin, as well as in the VL. No differences were found in the INR value (Table II).…”
Section: Hypertension In Cirrhotic Hcv Patients Treated With Antiviramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The etiology of thrombocytopenia is multifactorial, including increased platelet sequestration in the spleen in congestive splenomegaly, which is caused by portal hypertention, decreased production of thrombopoietin, as well as platelet destruction as a result of immune processes or antibodies. (21) There was a significant difference in mean platelet count between the group of large esophageal varices and the group of small esophageal varices, with a significantly lower mean platelet count among large esophageal varices as compared with small esophageal varices. This is in line with a previous study reporting that low platelet count was an independent risk factor or predictor for the presence of esophageal varices and their size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Some simple serum non-invasive markers such as the Lok index, the Forns' index or the platelet count/spleen diameter ratio have shown a good performance for diagnosis varices. Remarkably, in a recent large-scale multicenter study a combination of a Lok index (cutoff 1.5) and a Forns' index (cutoff 8.8) had a high negative predictive value for excluding presence of clinically relevant varices that would benefit from primary prophylaxis (large varices or small varices with red signs or in Child-Pugh class C patients) [58]. The platelet count/spleen diameter ratio is a promising index recently proposed, which has shown a 100% negative predictive value for excluding any grade varices [59].…”
Section: Detection Of Varices and Prognostic Markers For Varicesmentioning
confidence: 98%