2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of neurosensory alterations after sagittal split ramus osteotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is supported by some previously reported studies which showed that the occurrence of postoperative NSD of the IAN after SSRO is actually not limited to only one variable, but certainly one of the major and frequent reported causes is surgical manipulation during medial dissection of soft tissues related to the lingula [2,11,12,15].On the contrary, a study carried out by Teerijoki-Oksa et al [16] to detect the risk factors of nerve injury during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy concluded that exposure or manipulation of the IAN usually had no effect on nerve function, but the IAN conduction tended to be more disturbed in cases with nerve laceration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is supported by some previously reported studies which showed that the occurrence of postoperative NSD of the IAN after SSRO is actually not limited to only one variable, but certainly one of the major and frequent reported causes is surgical manipulation during medial dissection of soft tissues related to the lingula [2,11,12,15].On the contrary, a study carried out by Teerijoki-Oksa et al [16] to detect the risk factors of nerve injury during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy concluded that exposure or manipulation of the IAN usually had no effect on nerve function, but the IAN conduction tended to be more disturbed in cases with nerve laceration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Kuroyanagi and Shimozato [11], in a study for prediction of neurosensory alterations after SSRO, reported that the development of NSD is related to the surgical space on the medial side of the mandibular ramus and subsequent manipulation of the IAN in that region. Limited periosteal degloving prevents excessive stretching of the IAN during SSRO, thus lowering NSD incidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The NSD caused by damage to the IAN is reportedly 9-84.6% [39,40]. Even with careful surgery, injury to the IAN appears unpredictable.…”
Section: Neurosensory Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with careful surgery, injury to the IAN appears unpredictable. Multiple factors are considered responsible for the development of NSD after SSO, including fixation methods, patient age and surgical procedures, improper splinting, magnitude of mandibular movement, experience of the surgeon, and timing of the postoperative neurosensory evaluation [40]. Injury to the IAN may happen with direct and indirect intraoperative trauma and results in change of sensibility or altered sensation of the lower lip and/or mental region.…”
Section: Neurosensory Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%