2017
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30283-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: advances in biomarkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
208
2
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
7
208
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined measures account for 85% of the variance, whereas unimodal models explain only 35% (CST‐R) and 37% (EEG power) of the variance. We included age as a predictive factor in the model because younger age has been shown to be favorable for outcome (Nakayama, Jørgensen, Raaschou, & Olsen, ; Stinear, ; Veerbeek et al, ). In the present model, however, age was positively associated to motor function, which might well be an unspecific result given the small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combined measures account for 85% of the variance, whereas unimodal models explain only 35% (CST‐R) and 37% (EEG power) of the variance. We included age as a predictive factor in the model because younger age has been shown to be favorable for outcome (Nakayama, Jørgensen, Raaschou, & Olsen, ; Stinear, ; Veerbeek et al, ). In the present model, however, age was positively associated to motor function, which might well be an unspecific result given the small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last years, it became clear that treatment outcomes are quite heterogeneous across patients including responders and nonresponders (Stinear, ). Likely, there might not be one generalizable interventional treatment protocol for all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without an intact corticospinal tract, no type of therapeutic approach, whether MST, functional electrical stimulation, robotics, etc., will be effective. Thus, we need to use biomarkers that tell us whether an individual has the neurobiological capacity to improve . Research studies in the motor domain often stratify participants according to stroke severity to avoid scenarios where all severely affected individuals end up in the control or experimental group.…”
Section: How Do We Move Forward?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction of patient recovery has been an area of active research where much of the recent developments have focused on using imaging techniques to correlate changes in brain structure and perfusion patterns to clinical outcomes [1015], or to use other neurophysiological and neuroimaging biomarkers to predict recovery [16, 17]. However, these approaches offer reasonable predictions of recovery only when the brain is imaged immediately following a stroke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%