2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of miRNA targets by learning from interaction sequences

Abstract: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in a diverse variety of biological processes through regulating the expression of target genes in the post-transcriptional level. So, it is of great importance to discover the targets of miRNAs in biological research. But, due to the short length of miRNAs and limited sequence complementarity to their gene targets in animals, it is challenging to develop algorithms to predict the targets of miRNA accurately. Here we developed a new miRNA target prediction algorithm using a multi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The search of expression-changing candidate miRNAs should be based on two main criteria: (1) calculation of thermodynamic properties (implemented in, for instance, the Vienna RNA package v2. * [31], which is incorporated in the IntaRNA [30] algorithm), and (2) classification of targets as effective and ineffective, which may come from definitions of "canonical" and "non-canonical" seeds or from applying deep learning methods [73]. That is why the algorithms of MicroSNiPer (a "canonical" interaction predictor) and IntaRNA (an extended flexible RNA-RNA binding analyzer) were incorporated into the proposed pipeline in order to evaluate a wide spectrum of miRNA targeting sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search of expression-changing candidate miRNAs should be based on two main criteria: (1) calculation of thermodynamic properties (implemented in, for instance, the Vienna RNA package v2. * [31], which is incorporated in the IntaRNA [30] algorithm), and (2) classification of targets as effective and ineffective, which may come from definitions of "canonical" and "non-canonical" seeds or from applying deep learning methods [73]. That is why the algorithms of MicroSNiPer (a "canonical" interaction predictor) and IntaRNA (an extended flexible RNA-RNA binding analyzer) were incorporated into the proposed pipeline in order to evaluate a wide spectrum of miRNA targeting sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictive models were used to assess the influence of mutations spanned by the top ten ranked features of each cancer type (whether they are of low, medium or high resolution) on splice sites (using SpliceAI 85 ), miRNA binding sites (using cnnMirTarget 86 ), mRNA expression levels (using Xpresso 87 ), polyadenylation (using SANPolyA 88 ), 3D folding (using Akita 89 ) and several protein-mRNA binding sites (using DeepCLIP 90 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deepmirtar [9] uses 750 manually extracted features in 7 categories, using a stack denoising autoencoder as a model, and achieves 93% accuracy at the site level. Xueming [10] uses a multi-layer convolutional neural network(CNN) stack structure, processing site, and gene rank prediction, and the model can use full-length mRNAs as input. However, even though these deep learning methods have achieved good results, there are still some problems that need to be improved.…”
Section: A Mirna Target Prediction Model Based On Distributed Representation Learning and Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%