2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of minimum surface roughness in end milling mold parts using neural network and genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
96
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The chromosomes are then evaluated employing a certain fitness criteria and the best ones are kept while the others are discarded. This process repeats until one chromosome has the best fitness and is taken as the optimum solution of the problem [16].…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm (Ga)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chromosomes are then evaluated employing a certain fitness criteria and the best ones are kept while the others are discarded. This process repeats until one chromosome has the best fitness and is taken as the optimum solution of the problem [16].…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm (Ga)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chromosomes are then evaluated employing a certain fitness criteria and the best ones are kept while the others are discarded. This process repeats until one chromosome has the best fitness and is taken as the optimum solution of the problem [16].The computational procedure involved in maximizing the fitness function 1. Choose a suitable string length l nq = to represent the n design variables of the design vector X .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other authors consider the mapping function selection an important factor for ANN models. For example, Oktem, Erzurumlu and Erzincanli (2006) tested in their work that tangent hyperbolic function leads to a minimum training error for the prediction of surface roughness.…”
Section: Guidelines For Ann Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit value of Ra specified in the product design documentation must be attained, nevertheless tool wear may hamper these efforts at certain stages of production. In the event of such an occurrence, constant monitoring of the state of machined surfaces [3,4,5] enables spotting the defect and applying the most sensible solutioncutting tool change. However, this will inevitably lead to halting the production process and generate delay of machining time of a given lot of machined products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%