2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.06.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of micelle–water partition coefficient from the theoretical derived molecular descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before training the network, the parameters of the number of nodes in the hidden layer, weights and biases learning rates, and momentum were optimized. The procedure of optimization of these parameters was explained in our previous works [44,45]. Table 4 shows the architecture and specification of the optimized network.…”
Section: Non-linear Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before training the network, the parameters of the number of nodes in the hidden layer, weights and biases learning rates, and momentum were optimized. The procedure of optimization of these parameters was explained in our previous works [44,45]. Table 4 shows the architecture and specification of the optimized network.…”
Section: Non-linear Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the correlation weights of their models indicates that vitamins are most likely to interact with water and octanol by more complex mechanisms than various compounds under consideration, which are not vitamins. Fatemi and Karimian [12] studied the micelle-water partition coefficients of 81 organic compounds in an SDS solution by the quantitative structure-property relationship method. Chen et al [13] correlated 209 molecular structure patterns of polychlorinated diphenyl ethers (PCDEs) with their n-octanol/water partition coefficient (lgK ow ) and sub-cooled liquid water solubilities (-logS w,l ) using the stepwise multiple regression (SMR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance of the QSPR model heavily depends on the computational method adopted to build the model [3]. Many different methods, such as multiple linear regression (MLR) [2,4], partial least square analysis (PLS) [5,6], multilayer perceptrons (MLP) neural network [6,7], radial basis function neural network (RBF NN) [8] Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) [9][10][11], and support vector machine (SVM) [3,12], have been used in QSPR models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%