2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40891-016-0051-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Maximum Dry Density and Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cement Stabilised Soil Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques

Abstract: The soft soil that has not enough in situ bearing capacity needs proper stabilization before any construction can be done on this soil. Cement stabilization has been found to be an effective method to improve the soil properties by many researchers. The strength development in a cement stabilized mix depends on a number of factors such as the soil properties, the water-cement ratio and the percentage of cement in the mix. In the present study an attempt is made to develop prediction model to determine the maxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors evaluated the effectiveness of the two models and discovered that the ANN is less superior to the ANFIS. Machine learning models were developed by [10] to predict the UCS and MDD of soils stabilized by cement. The adopted machine learning algorithms were multivariate adaptive regression splines and functional networks, and their performance was compared to four models presented in [7], namely SVM and ANN (Bayesian regularization, differential evolution, and Levenberg-Marquardt).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors evaluated the effectiveness of the two models and discovered that the ANN is less superior to the ANFIS. Machine learning models were developed by [10] to predict the UCS and MDD of soils stabilized by cement. The adopted machine learning algorithms were multivariate adaptive regression splines and functional networks, and their performance was compared to four models presented in [7], namely SVM and ANN (Bayesian regularization, differential evolution, and Levenberg-Marquardt).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the tests confirm that the proposed models are satisfactory. Suman et al [10] developed AI models to determine the MDD and the UCS of cement stabilized soil. The employed algorithms were functional networks (FN) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and compared their performance with four models presented in [8], which are BRNN, LMNN, DENN, and SVM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molaabasi et al [59] applied the group method of data handling (GMDH)-type ANNs to predict the stress-strain behavior of zeolitecemented sand based on results of 216 UCS tests, showing GMDH can be a reliable tool for capturing the influence of various parameters on the behavior of stabilized sand mixtures. Suman et al [60] developed predictive models for the UCS of cement-stabilized soils using functional networks and multivariate adaptive regression splines based on a literature database, reporting these AI techniques' generalization ability to be better than ANNs. They found the most influential input parameters to be moisture content and gravel content, among others (Atterberg limits, sand and cement content).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%