Prediction of maturity in pea (Pisum satinum L.)

Mosjidis, J. A.; Alvarez, Lilian Gómez; Araya, Edmundo

doi:10.1016/0378-4290(81)90074-5

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar results are reported from Mosjidis, et al, (1981), Kalapchieva, (2013). They used the regression coefficient for predicting the time for pea harvesting.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…The information for the mutability and interaction of the quantitative characteristics in the plants population have exceptional meaning for increasing the effectiveness of the selection work. One of the popular methods for clarifying the concrete type of investigated relationships in biological objects is carried with the methods of regression analysis, which give opportunity for prognoses (Mosjidis, et al, 1981).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Model of high-productive varieties in forage pea

Kosev¹

2015

JCEA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A linear equation of regression was used for establishment of the influence of quantitative characteristics on the grain productivity in forage pea and for development of a model for breeding work. The model for pea plant with high productivity was characterized by average height of 60-70 cm, 8-10 formed pods, 30-40 seeds per plant and 160-260 g in regard to 1000-seed weight. The obtained results showed that the greatest effect on grain productivity had the seed number per plant, first pod height and 1000-seed weight. Kristal variety had high ecological plasticity and could be considered as close to an ideal type, suitable for growing under wide range of environments. Pleven 4 and Rezonator were determined as high-productive varieties and with low stability, Kerpo and Pikardi-as low-productive but stable varieties. Druzba was identified as unstable and lowproductive variety.

show abstract

“…Similar results are reported from Mosjidis, et al, (1981), Kalapchieva, (2013). They used the regression coefficient for predicting the time for pea harvesting.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Model of high-productive varieties in forage pea

Kosev¹

2015

JCEA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…That is, the more ovules there are in a pod, the longer it takes for the embryos in those ovules to reach the same level of development as embryos in same length pods with fewer ovules. This kind of result, in which the formation of more structures delays the development of subsequent structures or the onset of a developmental stage, is in agreement with the report of Mosjidis, Alvarez and Araya (1981) in peas (Pisum sativum L.).…”

Section: Correlation and Regression Analysissupporting

confidence: 90%

Prediction of the Developmental Stage of the Embryo in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

1986

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When undertaking experiments with fruits and ovules in tissue culture, it is important for embryos to be at the same developmental stage. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) plants cv. Hermosillo were grown under growth chamber conditions. Length, width, fresh weight, dry weight, total number of ovules, and no. of growing ovules were measured in the fruits. The embryos were classified according to their developmental stage as globular, early heart, heart, late heart, and torpedo. Data were analyzed using correlations, multiple regression, and path coefficient analysis. Embryo stage (ES) was highly correlated with days after pollination (DAP), pod fresh weight, pod dry weight, pod length, pod width and length x width. Regression analysis indicated that the best estimates of ES using one, two or three independent variables can be obtained with pod length (R 2 = 0-726); pod fresh weight (R* = 0-726); DAP and fresh weight (R* = 0797); DAP, fresh weight and number of growing ovules (R 2 = 0-836), respectively. Path coefficient analysis showed that pod fresh wt is the most important variable affecting ES.

show abstract

Prediction of maturity in pea (Pisum satinum L.)

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

Model of high-productive varieties in forage pea

Model of high-productive varieties in forage pea

Prediction of the Developmental Stage of the Embryo in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About