2022
DOI: 10.1055/a-1993-2371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Marathon Performance using Artificial Intelligence

Abstract: Although studies used machine learning algorithms to predict performances in sports activities, none, to the best of our knowledge, have used and validated two artificial intelligence techniques: artificial neural network (ANN) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) in the running discipline of marathon and compared the accuracy or precision of the predicted performances. Official French rankings for the 10-km road and marathon events in 2019 were scrutinized over a dataset of 820 athletes (aged 21, having run 10km and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(148 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study that utilized variables such as underlying 10-kilometer performance, BMI, age, and gender, the ANN and KNN models were used to predict marathon performance. The results showed that the correlation coe cients of both the ANN and KNN models reached 0.9, and the prediction accuracies were above 94% (with KNN outperforming ANN with an average absolute error of 2.4% compared to 5.6% for ANN), indicating high accuracy 17 . Whether using mathematical models or AI-based intelligent algorithms for predicting running performance, the results demonstrate high precision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study that utilized variables such as underlying 10-kilometer performance, BMI, age, and gender, the ANN and KNN models were used to predict marathon performance. The results showed that the correlation coe cients of both the ANN and KNN models reached 0.9, and the prediction accuracies were above 94% (with KNN outperforming ANN with an average absolute error of 2.4% compared to 5.6% for ANN), indicating high accuracy 17 . Whether using mathematical models or AI-based intelligent algorithms for predicting running performance, the results demonstrate high precision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have employed linear regression to formulate prediction equations, prompting us to explore this approach in our study [ 14 , 16 , 32 , 33 ]. Additionally, a recent study employed artificial intelligence methodologies to predict marathon completion times [ 34 ]. We used our marathon epidemiological survey data to make a prediction of half-marathon performance for male recreational half-marathon runners in a feasible, applicable manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current research in this area focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of different digital health technologies in objectively measuring physical activity and sedentary behavior (e.g., accelerometers, and wristband devices). Researchers are also investigating the application of digital health interventions to improve individual physical activity [45] and sedentary behavior [46,47], exploring the relationship between digital health technologies and exercise behavior [48,49], and studying the correlation between digital health and exercise performance [50,51]. Prominent digital health technologies used in this area include virtual reality, social media, and wearable devices such as activity monitors, accelerometers, and motion sensors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%