2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.103049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of leaf area index using thermal infrared data acquired by UAS over a mixed temperate forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in previous research, the echo intensity needed to be corrected, and in mountainous areas with a high slope, the echo intensity was greatly affected by distance and incidence angle, resulting in a decrease in the estimation accuracy of LAI. In 2022, Stobbelaar et al [40] inverted the LAI of mixed broadleaf-conifer forest based on seven vegetation indices and compared it with the LAI value estimated using surface reflectance, proving that the prediction accuracy of modeling with additional variables was higher. However, due to the heterogeneity of leaf characteristics and growth rhythm among different tree species [41], it was difficult to avoid the influence of the vegetation's canopy size, diameter at breast height (DBH) and tree height parameters, resulting in large fluctuations in the estimated results of LAIe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in previous research, the echo intensity needed to be corrected, and in mountainous areas with a high slope, the echo intensity was greatly affected by distance and incidence angle, resulting in a decrease in the estimation accuracy of LAI. In 2022, Stobbelaar et al [40] inverted the LAI of mixed broadleaf-conifer forest based on seven vegetation indices and compared it with the LAI value estimated using surface reflectance, proving that the prediction accuracy of modeling with additional variables was higher. However, due to the heterogeneity of leaf characteristics and growth rhythm among different tree species [41], it was difficult to avoid the influence of the vegetation's canopy size, diameter at breast height (DBH) and tree height parameters, resulting in large fluctuations in the estimated results of LAIe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%