2020
DOI: 10.1002/sam.11452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Kumaraswamy distribution in constant‐stress model based on type‐I hybrid censored data

Abstract: In this work, a particular problem of Bayesian prediction concerning future observation from Kumaraswamy distribution under constant-stress partially accelerated life test is treated. Type-I hybrid censored data of the observed data are utilized. One-and two-sample Bayesian prediction intervals for an unobserved future sample from Kumaraswamy distribution are settled. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure is used to get Bayesian predictive intervals.Lastly, simulation study and a numerical example are give… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, many scholars have conducted research on the parameter estimation of the Ku lifetime distribution. Fawzy (2020) considered the prediction of constant-stress accelerated life tests for products following the Ku distribution under Type-I hybrid CeSc. Mohan and Chacko (2021) investigated different estimation methods of Kumaraswamy-exponential distribution based on adaptive type-II progressive CeSc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, many scholars have conducted research on the parameter estimation of the Ku lifetime distribution. Fawzy (2020) considered the prediction of constant-stress accelerated life tests for products following the Ku distribution under Type-I hybrid CeSc. Mohan and Chacko (2021) investigated different estimation methods of Kumaraswamy-exponential distribution based on adaptive type-II progressive CeSc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Golizadeh et al [42] used ungrouped data to analyze classical and Bayesian estimators for the shape parameter of the KuD and also considered the relationship between them. For more details, see Sindhu et al [43], Sharaf EL-Deen et al [44], Wang [45], Kumar et al [46] and Fawzy [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%