2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of impact damage tolerance of drop impacted WGFRP composite by artificial neural network using acoustic emission parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These diagrams were further utilized for designing purposes. Ramasamy et al [190] used a feed forward ANN to predict the behavior of GFRP composites when subjected to drop impact test. Data fed to the ANN model was experimentally obtained by conducting a drop impact test and acoustic emission technique, wherein Purlin adaptive learning function along with the gradient descent algorithm was used.…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These diagrams were further utilized for designing purposes. Ramasamy et al [190] used a feed forward ANN to predict the behavior of GFRP composites when subjected to drop impact test. Data fed to the ANN model was experimentally obtained by conducting a drop impact test and acoustic emission technique, wherein Purlin adaptive learning function along with the gradient descent algorithm was used.…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, ANN has been employed as a tool to model material behaviour, and has an ability to model engineering materials with complex nonlinear characteristics. [13][14][15][16] Further, the ANN methodology has a well-known physical basis 17 and in addition it is also able to perform prediction of complex thermal behaviour 18 and impact damage behaviour 19 of materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, we must first shortly discuss the power and considerations of the AE measurements, as these diagnostic and prognostic algorithms rely on the recorded AE data. AE data can be considered quite powerful as it has been used to, among others, detect damage initiation, 18,19 distinguish different damage types, 20,21 and to predict residual strength 22,23 and remaining useful life. 24,25 Yet, a great challenge with implementing AE technique is that its measurements are influenced by a variety of factors, such as sensor type, placement, and coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%