2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of imbibition in unconsolidated granular materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
36
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The consequence of this coarsening of the pore space is that sub-pore phenomena cannot be simulated directly; however, network modeling allows flow to be modeled over orders-of-magnitude larger physical domains. Network model simulations have been used to study processes such as imbibition (Fenwick and Blunt 1998;Gladkikh and Bryant 2005), drainage Fenwick and Blunt 1998), single phase and relative permeability computation (Bryant and Blunt 1992;Oren and Bakke 2002), the effects of pore structure on relative permeability (Bryant and Johnson 2003;Al-Kharusi and Blunt 2008), capillary pressure behavior (Fatt 1956;Silin and Patzek 2006;Al-Kharusi and Blunt 2008), residence time distributions (Thompson and Fogler 1997), dispersion (Sahimi et al 1986), measurement of interfacial area and fluid phase distribution (Dalla et al 2002), relationships between non-wetting phase distributions and pore geometry (Hilpert et al 2000), non-Newtonian flow in packed beds (Balhoff and Thompson 2004), and with continuum models in a multiscale framework (Balhoff et al 2007(Balhoff et al , 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequence of this coarsening of the pore space is that sub-pore phenomena cannot be simulated directly; however, network modeling allows flow to be modeled over orders-of-magnitude larger physical domains. Network model simulations have been used to study processes such as imbibition (Fenwick and Blunt 1998;Gladkikh and Bryant 2005), drainage Fenwick and Blunt 1998), single phase and relative permeability computation (Bryant and Blunt 1992;Oren and Bakke 2002), the effects of pore structure on relative permeability (Bryant and Johnson 2003;Al-Kharusi and Blunt 2008), capillary pressure behavior (Fatt 1956;Silin and Patzek 2006;Al-Kharusi and Blunt 2008), residence time distributions (Thompson and Fogler 1997), dispersion (Sahimi et al 1986), measurement of interfacial area and fluid phase distribution (Dalla et al 2002), relationships between non-wetting phase distributions and pore geometry (Hilpert et al 2000), non-Newtonian flow in packed beds (Balhoff and Thompson 2004), and with continuum models in a multiscale framework (Balhoff et al 2007(Balhoff et al , 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach presented in this paper is based on the previous research [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. We simulate physical processes at the pore scale in simple but physically representative model rocks.…”
Section: Pore Scale Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach is applied to compute capillary pressure curves [10][11][12], absolute and relative permeabilities [4,[8][9][10], electrical resistivity [6,10], acoustic velocities [4,7], and NMR transverse relaxation spectrum [4]. Corresponding algorithms have been described in the previous publications.…”
Section: Pore Scale Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A variety of models, such as capillary models [1][2][3][4] , process-based models [5][6][7] , random packing models [8][9][10][11] , pore-scale network models [12][13][14][15][16] , and statistical models [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] , have been proposed to characterize the porous structure and its physical, mechanical and chemical responses. Roughly, these models can be classified into reconstruction models and non-reconstruction models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%